<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

    <channel>
    
    <title><![CDATA[adamproctermain]]></title>
    <link>http://www.adamprocter.org/mainstructure/longformwriting/index.php</link>
    <description>Main blog posts </description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>adamprocter@mac.com</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2010</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2010-11-01T22:57:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://expressionengine.com/" />
    

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Should I be a little narked with MacRabbit?]]></title>
      <link>http://www.adamprocter.org/index.php/longformwriting/should_i_be_a_little_narked</link>
      <guid>http://www.adamprocter.org/index.php/longformwriting/should_i_be_a_little_narked#When:09:39:50Z</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>I am a huge fan of the editors <a href="http://www.macrabbit.com/espresso/">Espresso</a> and CSS Edit from <a href="http://www.macrabbit.com">MacRabbit</a>. I have personally been using these apps since 2008 and do not recommend any other above these. CSS Edit blew me away when I first found out about it and Espresso was equally impressive.</p>
]]></description>
      <dc:subject><![CDATA[]]></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2011-10-18T09:39:50+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[New Adventures in Web Design]]></title>
      <link>http://www.adamprocter.org/index.php/longformwriting/new_adventures_in_web_design</link>
      <guid>http://www.adamprocter.org/index.php/longformwriting/new_adventures_in_web_design#When:12:02:47Z</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<figure>
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/natecroft/5402584329/" title="New-Adventures-2 by natecroft, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5257/5402584329_bafd5bfed2.jpg" width="500" height="333" alt="New-Adventures-2" /></a><figcaption>Simon Collison by Nate Croft</figcaption>
</figure>

<p><a href="http://newadventuresconf.com/">New Adventures in Web Design</a> was the first industry web conference I had the pleasure of attending & with the star line up consisting of some of the leading designers on the web my expectations were sky high. I have attended a number of education conferences & industry events but not a specific web design one. I have also attended a number of international film festivals. </p>]]></description>
      <dc:subject><![CDATA[New Adventures in Web Design,]]></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2011-02-08T12:02:47+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Should Football Referees come out after a game and explain X ?]]></title>
      <link>http://www.adamprocter.org/index.php/longformwriting/should_football_referees_come_out_after_a_game_and_explain_x</link>
      <guid>http://www.adamprocter.org/index.php/longformwriting/should_football_referees_come_out_after_a_game_and_explain_x#When:22:57:19Z</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Simple answer - No they shouldn't.</p>
<p>I caught some of Match of the Day (2 I think) to see the goal by Nana and the following 'debate' from the pundits who went on to call for Refs to come out and talk about decisions as they believed this would help the game, I am confident it would not.</p>
<p>They also mentioned the FA's respect initiative. Firstly lets see some of these 'super' players show some respect for the referees. Refs run the game and their decisions are final.</p>
]]></description>
      <dc:subject><![CDATA[]]></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-11-01T22:57:19+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Redesign]]></title>
      <link>http://www.adamprocter.org/index.php/longformwriting/redesign</link>
      <guid>http://www.adamprocter.org/index.php/longformwriting/redesign#When:23:47:42Z</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[So its been a long time coming and a long way to go. But I have been feeling more and more that to embrace the true nature of the web my site should iterate (semi) live. Otherwise I will never make it live. So here is it, no layout and little features and probably some broken links, however it will be up to date and working more than any previous dead versions. ]]></description>
      <dc:subject><![CDATA[]]></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-10-19T23:47:42+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[The Digital Economy bill]]></title>
      <link>http://www.adamprocter.org/index.php/longformwriting/entry_one</link>
      <guid>http://www.adamprocter.org/index.php/longformwriting/entry_one#When:00:59:47Z</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Digital Economy bill (#debill) was passed in the <a href="http://www.parliament.uk/site_information/glossary.cfm?ref=washup_4876">'washup'</a>
and was granted Royal assent on the 8th of April and will come into force on June the 12th.</p><br />
<a href="http://writetoreply.org/deact/">The Digital Economy bill</a><p> is a set of proposals designed to promote 'Digital Britain'. The Act covers many areas along with that of online copyright infringement. This area has had the most media attention as it sets out measures to disconnect users from the internet. Internet subscribers who are accused of allowing their internet connections to be used for copyright infringement (both home users and public wifi owners) are now liable even if someone else downloads or uploads something over your connection. It also outlines options to block websites and disconnect those who run these services if they are believed to be used in conjunction with copyright infringement.</p>]]></description>
      <dc:subject><![CDATA[]]></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-09-11T00:59:47+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    
    </channel>
</rss>
